First off, George > Paul. Mainly because George > All Other Beatles. Always.
Secondly, I clicked on this thinking it was a post in beatlepics, and then was like, 'Wait.... bean's in here too?" Confusion!. Amyway, I have never read a George-only biography (though, not for lack of trying), but if I had to pick one, I'd probably go with I Me Mine, mainly because it was written by the man himself. My library used to have it, but before I could check it out, it disappeared. Written in 1980, it's 400 pages, including a lot of pictures and copies of his handwritten lyrics (with notes!). Every few months I make note to find it somewhere, then I forget. There are a few others though, written by other folks, and therefore, not as interesting. The ones our library has are Behind Sad EyesDark Horse and Harrison. The only one I have read is the last one.. it's a collection of his coverage in Rolling Stone. It was pretty good, but I still need to find that other one.
no subject
Secondly, I clicked on this thinking it was a post in beatlepics, and then was like, 'Wait.... bean's in here too?" Confusion!. Amyway, I have never read a George-only biography (though, not for lack of trying), but if I had to pick one, I'd probably go with I Me Mine, mainly because it was written by the man himself. My library used to have it, but before I could check it out, it disappeared. Written in 1980, it's 400 pages, including a lot of pictures and copies of his handwritten lyrics (with notes!). Every few months I make note to find it somewhere, then I forget. There are a few others though, written by other folks, and therefore, not as interesting. The ones our library has are Behind Sad Eyes Dark Horse and Harrison. The only one I have read is the last one.. it's a collection of his coverage in Rolling Stone. It was pretty good, but I still need to find that other one.