Oh snap! I did this like a week ago and somehow managed to not post it. I am slack. I'm an . (Analytical Thinker). This means that our "different social needs may create some frustrations in your relationship," and we must "try to balance the joys and frustrations of your partnership and bear in mind that learning from each other is more helpful than fighting each other!" Or at least that's what it says here.
I got the same! But I feel as if I am an SI for all the wrong reasons. Like, I felt as if I SHOULD be picking the OTHER answer in theory because that would be how I would PREFER it, but had to always go with the other one that didn't involve rigid plans and time structures - I LIKE rigid plans and time structures, but am always too lazy to follow through with them. WHAT'S UP WITH THAT.
I did this and checked our compatibility on it, here's a chunk that might interest you:
The conflicts you two have to deal with usually stem from your difference regarding the third type preference: The „thinking“ partner often is uncomfortable and even impatient when dealing with emotions, so he inadvertently hurts his partner‘s feelings - not really seldom, as „feeling“ types tend to take anything very personally anyway and are unable to take things with a pinch of salt. In return, the emotional outbursts of the feeling partner are a real challenge to thinking types, as well as his tendency to base his decisions on how he feels about an issue rather than on objective and locigal observations. This difference may be a considerable problem for a relationship and requires a lot of tolerance and will to compromise on both sides: The feeling partner has to learn not to be offended so quickly and stand a debate while the thinking partner‘s job is not to dismiss his partner‘s feelings as insiginificant or overreactions. Try to see this difference as complementary strenghts rather than faults in character!
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2008-06-12 09:36 pm (UTC)*points*
Our compatibility
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-12 09:57 pm (UTC)I am slack. I'm an(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-12 10:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-13 12:38 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-13 03:37 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-14 08:38 am (UTC)The conflicts you two have to deal with usually stem from your difference regarding the third type preference: The „thinking“ partner often is uncomfortable and even impatient when dealing with emotions, so he inadvertently hurts his partner‘s feelings - not really seldom, as „feeling“ types tend to take anything very personally anyway and are unable to take things with a pinch of salt. In return, the emotional outbursts of the feeling partner are a real challenge to thinking types, as well as his tendency to base his decisions on how he feels about an issue rather than on objective and locigal observations. This difference may be a considerable problem for a relationship and requires a lot of tolerance and will to compromise on both sides: The feeling partner has to learn not to be offended so quickly and stand a debate while the thinking partner‘s job is not to dismiss his partner‘s feelings as insiginificant or overreactions. Try to see this difference as complementary strenghts rather than faults in character!
...it's funny cause it's true.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: